I have been writing porn reviews for almost one full year now and I have finally come to understand the necessity (yes, necessity) of pornography in modern society. Let me explain. I recently dated a comely lass who vaguely resembled a Suicide Girl. During our courtship, we had sex a number of times and each time we fucked in the dreadful missionary position. Yawn. Last week, after giving her what must have been an awesome orgasm, the kind of explosive orgasm that makes the earth quake and kills cervical cancer, my lady asked me if there was anything she could do to get me off. I replied, “Well, you could get on top and turn around — I know most girls don’t like that position, but it’s usually the only way I can cum during the act of lovemaking.” Her response to my humble request? No! Actually, she said, “No…but maybe in a month.” In a month?! I didn’t want to cum in a month, I wanted to cum right then and there!

I mentioned this episode to my friend Diamond J. and his response was priceless: “That is unacceptable!” You know what? Diamond J. was right: That was unacceptable! It’s not like I asked her to toss my salad or let me punch her in the back of the head while I was fucking her in the ass! I just asked her to fuck me in the reverse cowgirl position (a.k.a. Queen’s position)! And I told her it was the only way I’d be able to get off, thus her denial of my request was her passive-aggressive way of informing me that she didn’t give a flying fuck if I got off or not. Now it’s bad enough that my lady was selfish in bed, but, adding insult to injury, she refused to give head! Can you believe it? There are women living in this century that don’t enjoy giving head! And this is precisely why pornography needs to exist — cos there are dumb bastards like me who are willing to hook up with lousy lays and need to live vicariously through muscle-bound jerk-offs who get to fuck beautiful troubled women who will do anything and everything in the sack. And the best thing about pornography? You won’t get gonorrhea from it (I can’t say the same for my blowjobphobic Suicide Girl…).

I can't count every time I've heard this question asked. And there may be a point to the it - there is so much porn available for free that it is mind-boggling.

There are different keys to the answer:

• Simple cost/benefit analysis


• What level of quality are you satisfied with?


• Moral - nobody questions why you have to pay for car fuel or a book

Cost/benefit - How much time and effort are you willing to spend to avoid paying say 30 bucks for a month's membership?

It's fascinating how far many of us are willing to go in order to avoid paying for something. We put up with pop-up hells, the risk of spyware, thumbnails linking to completely different sites than the expected full-size image just to name a few annoyances. This is standard when searching for the free porn that we are looking for. Not to mention going through tons of sites and bookmarks to filter out the good free sites from the bad - trust me I've been there.

And unfortunately there isn't even such a thing as free lunch. You might not whip your credit card out and type in its numbers, but you pay for it one way or the other - in most cases with your time.

Sure enough - some people might like this "hunting process", and yes it can be fun at times - but most times you just want to find some good stuff, "get it over with" and get on with your life.

Think about the time you have spent finding your favorite porn movies and pictures. I guarantee if you start calculating your hourly rate, it is not very high...

Plus I bet you have already found a few sites that deliver content that you really like, but are reluctant to join because it costs money. So you have searched your favorite free sites over and over again for more of it and regularly check back to the sites that you initially found it on.

But why are we so reluctant to start paying for something? Porn is a product like everything else. Somebody has spent money producing it in the first place - the models don't work for free and the cameras and computers that edit the content afterwards also need to be paid for. Plus of course developing a site and the cost of bandwidth. And multiply this for each new episode of content added to its archive - sites update everywhere from never (the ones to avoid obviously) to several times a day (the really good ones).

Honestly when you take everything into consideration, most sites are actually not bad deals.

Paysites offer much better quality

Convenience isn't the only advantage of joining a paysite though. Often the free stuff you are able to find is lower quality than the original content. Any modern decent paysite offers high reolution images and high quality videos. The free stuff is often a lower resolution version that is provided for modem-users.

The question of moral

Finally there is the question of moral - to most, this is the least important aspect of it all, but nevertheless it deserves to be mentioned.

Thanks to various political and religious interest origanizations, it is unfortunately a frequent opinion that porn is low status, the people who work with it are scumbags and people who look at it shouldn't  have to pay for it. Well, I personally consider porn a product like anything else. Like I mentioned earlier it takes money to produce (main cost), distribute (marginal thanks to the internet) and then obviously some profit on top of that.

I personally think the people who take up the task of producing quality porn despite society's views deserve the support of paying customers.

If you have never joined a paysite before, I recommend that you first of all read our buyer's guide and then afterwards browse our site to find a site that you will like. Start with our list of 50 selected top reviews that is featured across our site - you are almost sure to find one or more sites that will appeal to you there, and I highly doubt you will be disappointed by any of them.

Happy surfing!

- Jeppe

She has the most stunning figure I have seen for a long long time. Fantastic big soft natural breasts that hang and move in perfect precision. Some of her movies and  pics are very sexy indeed, some are not. There is quite a lot of material on her site but certainly not "tons" as claimed.

I was just plodding away downloading one night inbetween reading a Robert Goddard novel then suddenly I was told I had reached my limit and could download no more for 24 hours. Came as a bit of a shock but perhaps I should have read terms properly. Why they do this defies logic as is the most illogical and worthless act imaginable and seems to me it`s just for pure spite and no other reason. Why? Well, you can only download as much as the site has to offer. This can very easily be achieved in one month, you cannot download any more than what they have, so why not let you do it as quick as you wish? You can`t get any more from them, so what is the point I ask? The next night I reached my limit and was locked out, then on the fourth night I had all the site content so it was pointless going back on-line to them. Better for other members if you ask me.

On the fifth night I cancelled via CCBill`s website, then two nights later I thought I would grab a few photos -- low and fucking behold I was refused entry into the site. I sent some rather curt and direct letters to the webmaster, still received no replies, then abracadabra I was "allowed" back in. Sites like this suck and should have action taken against them by CCBill. I did mail CCBill telling them what happened and received a reply asking if I had typed my logins correctly. I mailed back explaining that was not the problem and that the site had blocked me for cancelling. I received another reply from CCBill asking if I had logged in correctly. Does anyone at CCBill have any initiative at all? I think not.

She is one hot and sexy girl but the fee is just not worth it. In any case any site that locks you out for cancelling is not worth patronising at all. Dawns place did the same to me yonks ago, won`t ever go back to her neither.

There are stacks of stolen freebies of Felicity Fey if you search but def. not as good as what you get off the site. Google her and get a gliff of those knockers loverly!!!!

Well, I have been back again and again to view movies on this site and I still cannot find them titillating or exciting at all.

No, softcore has nothing at all to do with my views, there is something absolute and vital missing from them all, well, almost all. One girl I found to be sexy -- and that was the gorgeous Eufrat, jeez, who picked that stupid name? 



On other sites, ie. europeanglamourgirls she is called Marina, a much more fitting nom-de-plume. She goes out of her way to look sexy, mind she doesn`t need to try very hard as she oozes it naturally and will never be out of work I guess. She is worth a join as there is a real lot of stuff relating to her. Try out Alice also.



Read the review of MC Nudes by Adult Reviews .net here

Take the tour of MC Nudes here

I joined this site some time ago and for the relatively small membership fee you certainly get your value in tit volume.

It has women on here with the biggest tits I have ever seen, on women who are not horrible fat slags that is, as most of the girls/women on here are reasonably built and not like some Sumo wrestler. Having said that they also have some of the ugliest mothers I have ever seen also. A paper bag and a tit fuck is all you would require of some of them.

Download times were pretty good and most movies are split into 10 segments of 1 minute, they are mpegs so get that wonderful free programme called mpegjoin and you can easily make into 1 large file. It will only join mpegs, so don`t bother with any other format. They have a couple of specials each month that are given as 1 large file, yet is still split for dial-up users, do we still have those these days?

If you are breast obsessed with huge, hanging, floppy, swinging, bouncing, wobbling tits the size of Mount Ararat then join. No silicon on this site at all just mounds of living flesh.

Video quality is not the best by a long shot, its a pity they don`t/won`t invest in some decent videography equipment as quality sure spoils a good thing.

Each month they have about 18 different scenes/girls and the whole lot is changed for a new lot the next month. So best not to join at the 1st of a month as you will miss out, best join in the middle then you will easily catch 2 months of tits. They then add, during the month about 350mb of clips of -- big tits, these are the girls of that month but consisting of clips cut out, or whatever but are still pretty good with the focus being on the girls tits moving about.

There is a picture archive but it is aweful, so I wouldn`t even count on this site having photographs, its worse than nothing at all.

So, if they got rid of the real uglies that creep in some months, drastically improved video quality, put up more material each month then it would be a real good site as as it stands it is just worth the join fee. If you stay for a second membership it rockets down to just $9.95 a month which is a gift as you are sure to get at least 1/2 dozen or so that's worth a wank I suppose. One good thing is you can easily check out all the girls that are on that month, so obviously if you find them tasty it`s well worth joining, give it a go if you are into massive tits, it's at least good for a laugh and won`t break the bank.

Cancelling is a breeze, so no problems there at all. Cheers.

Visit OverDeveloped amateurs here.

This is a follow-up to my previous user-review of Karups PC 

Since I joined less than 1 month ago there have been 4 pages of new movies added, each page has 8 different videos on it. Do the math. That is some upload rate and could well be one of the best on the net. The girls just keep getting better and fresher looking. I used to spend hours on a night looking for free pics and in particular free movies, only to be totally pissed off at the poor quality supplied and as an added bonus, often the odd trojan or serious spyware. Joining Karups PC is safe and will not dissapoint you, it is full of excellent high quality videos and photographs.

Jassie and Sarah are 2 of the new girls and they are gorgeous, you will only see them here and not by sniffing out freebies. Check out the preview pages and you will see what I mean, inside you will see them strip sexily and then  masturbate with their fingers and rubbing their tits, they certainly look as if they are genuinely enjoying themselves, as you no doubt will watching them. If the scrumptious girls on here don't please and excite you then I am afraid you are dead, sorry if no one told you but you are.



There is a model called Shay, who has stacks of pictures and some super movies, believe me, men would die to touch those tits of hers. Typical ski-slope tits, if you get my drift, lovely long sweeping line down with a huge upswept undercurve -- the absolute perrrrrfect tit -- check her out in the preview section, yet another girl you will find no freebies of kicking around the net. She is worth a join all by herself.

IMHO this is without any shadow of a doubt THEEE best web-site out there in the great blue.

This is the gorgeous Shay.



Read the review of Karups PC on Adult Reviews .net here

Take a tour of Karups PC here

If you are travelling the web to find and download pictures you for sure will be successful. But the differences between how well the site works differ very much. There are sites around that will be a charm for you and you will love them for sure - and others are a pain in the ass!

After having discovered a site you find interesting, you should try to recognize what sort of comfort it has. Does it have ZIP-files? To answer this you of course can check the preview. But my own recipe for this is to check out review sites like Adult Reviews - a review has to answer whether a site has ZIP-files, how well it is suited for downloading or whether it is hampering downloads as much as possible. If ZIP-files are not mentioned in reviews, there will most likely be none.

My recommendation is plain and simple: Prefer sites with ZIP-files! If you want that comfort to become the standard, contribute to make sites using them successful and sites not using them a loser!

If you have subscribed to a site, treat it fair. If you like it - others will too, so don't spoil it for everyone! Do not share the login with others (you will lose it), do not redistribute pictures and try to use safe and long enough passwords that are different for every site you subscribe to, to protect yourself against password thefts.

If you have decided to use a spider you should be aware that this can be a both practical and dangerous tool that is not to be abused. You can minimize your risk if you handle it with care as described above. But if there are ZIP-files on a site, NEVER try to use a spider! And if the spider won't work - what should you do? Well download content from the site manually but consider not keeping your subscription alive for a longer period and not returning to this site before they move forward and provide the beloved ZIP-files!

And if a site uses DRM - boycott it! This will be the best and perhaps only measurement to prevent many sites from using DRM in the future.

Use your common sense - and have fun!

- Uli

But what about those sites not offering ZIP-files and also not using these hampering strategies as described? Well, there are some nice little nifty tools around named "spiders" that might be able to do the job all alone, mostly just needing a starting adress and the password - then it takes some time but the result is the site's content on your harddrive whithout you lifting a finger. There are different kinds of such programs around, e.g. MisterPix, an older picture downloading tool which only tries to download specified content (pictures, movies, text-files etc.) but fails when sites are using Java or even PHP. Another example of the same strategy is Picaloader which can handle Java and very often manages with PHP or special password-entry pages. Different from these is Pagesucker, which tries to establish an exact working (!) copy of the downloaded site on your harddrive. It's obvious that this normally won't work with dynamically created structures of websites using databases and creating all web-code on demand. In fact you have to try out what works. Just note that a tool like "Get Right" is not a spider of this type - the difference is it can't analyze the target site and find out by itself what content is there.

Before crying happily about what I just told you and thinking this might be a solution to all of your problems you again should try to understand the webmasters' point of view: Spiders can cause a high load on websites increasing the load on the server for other users. Furthermore if you "do" a site with a spider you might be able to shorten your subscription, which the webmaster also won't like. On the other hand just looking at myself, successful use of spiders has had the effect that I subscribed to more sites than I would have done without a spider and thus spent more money there.

Nevertheless you should be aware of the webmasters' attitude towards spiders, which is something between strictly banning and overlooking it if the usage ain't too hard. There are some sites around where you can read "spiders strictly forbidden". That is not subject of discussion - take it as a fact. I consider this fair and acceptable as long as members are made aware of it on the site. Do not expect it to be just words - tools like the already mentioned Pennywize can clearly recognize the very typical traces of a spider and block them out very fast. If you are unlucky, you might even loose your subscription - I experienced that too. Even if there is nothing written about spiders, it's never clear whether the usage of such a tool is possible. It's a matter of webdesign, which is not something you can check from outside the members area and sites like the already mentioned "Realswingers" or "Rachel Aziani" are done in a way so that no spider can handle them - it simply does not find anything.

But even if the spider works and seems to be successful it is a risky situation: You very often do not know where the security download limit in Megabytes for a site is - but you should be aware that most sites have this! A little hint for this might be the presence of movies - if there are big movies around (most times it doesn't make any sense to download such movies with a spider - manually would be more appropriate) a download limit at least should enable you to download a few of them at one time. NEVER try to download a whole site at once! Check how much data the spider has downloaded and stop it if a given quota e.g. 200MB is reached. Next day you restart it again downloading the same amount thus flying below the webmaster's radar for the detection of hostile activities. The last hint for the usage of a spider: You can reduce the server load caused by the spider if you reduce the number of parallel connections the spider uses. According to my experience do never use more than 3-5 connections - if you are using more you won't be much faster anyway but a hostile reaction of a webmaster is much more likely.

You might have noticed some websites (especially movie sites) nowadays are promoted with "free downloads", "all movies downloadable", "no download-limit" and the like. Yes, there are still sites around offering this, but this also might be a trap: Especially many movie sites nowadays try to protect their content with DRM measures. DRM (Digital Rights Management) means you only can play all the movies as long as the source-site will allow it. You cannot give them to anybody else since you need a login (or the license itself). Ok, I consider the latter to be ok, but I am not willing to accept that any download is only workable as long as your installation of Microsoft's marvellous and reliable working operation system is alive - if you have to re-install it, all your DRM licences will be lost. A transfer or backup of these is not intented and not possible. My own personal way to handle DRM sites can be described with one word: boycott! And if I do a review of a site using DRM I promise the site-owner will not be pleased by this review! And from what I've seen by reviews of others I'm not alone with this attitude.

 Coming up: The conclusion

Bit of a mixed bag are the videos on this web-site. I am, myself confused as I can`t really put my finger on it. Is it the quality of movies? Certainly not as these are superb in all respects, colour, lighting, contrast, dynamic range captured, so obviously high quality recording equipment is being used. Granted they are a touch on the short side but certainly not a major issue. Are the women ugly? That must be it then, as they are the ugliest, fattest girls I have ever seen. If any one of them begged me I would not bed them. Now you know I am kidding. All of the girls exude pure class, they are mainly all slim, no silicon implants, all look very well groomed and it is obvious that a lot of care and attention has been taken to get hair/ make-up etc. just right, these are NOT your scruffy, couldn't-care-less models seen on some sites, Big Naturals springs to mind. Sorry you folks but just take a look at them and then compare. Some look as though they haven't combed or washed their hair in weeks, we do notice things like that you know.

Well, what I think it may be is that the videos are just too clinical, too well planned out. Too much of the videographer wanting to make a short Luc Goddard type movie, which just doesn`t work I reckon. This tends to make them un-sexy. Some are in black/white and blurring in and out. Not my scene I must say. I/ we spend a fortune on quality monitors then all sorts of software to get colours etc. just so and then you come a long to blur it! thankfully this is the exception rather than the rule.

I don`t normally bother with pictures, usually only interested in the videos but I must say these are some of the best quality picures I have seen. They offer three different sizes for viewing or downloading and of course these are zipped. There is no playing about for picture after picture stripping out of their clothes, as they come pre-packed in nature's natural skin at the start off. Some well thought out poses I liked very much and some super outdoor scenes, not too many shot in a studio. Some brilliant close up work that will have you drooling.

Why oh why do you people surf the net for hours on end trying to pick up those pathetic arrays of "freebies" ? I tell you it's a total waste of time. They mainly just dish out reject pictures or the quality is so bad that anything above postcard size is terrible. For the money this site asks it's well worth joining to get the full monty of all the high quality images. Images like these of the super sexy Alexa. Remember the more people that pay up money to join genuine sites such as this, then the more money these sites make to invest back to members, so you win always.

Download times I have found to be very good, depending on time of day, evening not ever so fast but as it draws on to 10.00 pm UK time the videos are screaming down at over 300kb/sec. Videos vary between 50 to over 140mb in size so it's not a lifetime's wait for downloads. Do what I do, read a good book as downloads progress, it's surprising then how fast the time flies. So if you want quality across the board and absolutely stunning girls, a lot are 18/19 years old, then this site is a must join. I read someone comment once regards how "poor" the pictures where on this site -- jeez that defies logic, they are the best anywhere to be seen.

 

Read the review of MC Nudes by Adult Reviews .net here

Take the tour of MC Nudes here

                        

Editor's comments: We have asked a few people who don't normally review websites, to post their comments about some of the sites we have reviewed. This is the first "user review" of many that we are going to post.

 

This is an excellent web-site if you can get past some rather odd site design. Namely you will find more than one girl of the same name, that can prove annoying at times, also when you go into the "collections" and the various girls on the site from the members home page, it only lists the photo sets and does not tell you if the girl has done video or not. Clicking onto and looking at the girl index is even dafter. There are dozens upon dozens of girls listed and lots of them with the self same name, for example there are 10 x Veras. There are 45 --yes 45---Veronikas and Veronicas. I am sure Karups could have made it much easier by giving them different names, even Vicky1 and Vicky2 would have helped a little bit.

 

There has, in the past few weeks been a major design update to this site. I was a member for the first time some 12/13 months ago and I must say it is a change for the better. I have mentioned the quality of their movies but since this design change things are very very good as far as quality goes. It must rate as up amongst the best. Their pictures are available in quick downloaded ZIP format and when viewed full size they fill half of my 17 inch monitor with excellent resolution. Its no use having pictures that are huge if the quality is not there, quality is with these. I also don`t think anyone apart from NASA would have a hardrive big enough to store all the pictures this site have. Even though this design change has not made finding the girls easier, what with having same name for lots of them, I didn`t find it an annoying issue as it is so fast to navigate site that it does not cause any sort of headache! Until of course you open up an album of movies (you will see what I mean when you join) you do not know which girls are in which album, nor is there a list to point you to the girls movies. This though, to me, is not a major drawback at all. But would be very handy if you have no patience and are in a hurry to find a particular girl you may have seen on the preview pages before you joined. Well tough, you will have to learn to be patient, its WELL worth it believe me.

Having said all that, the movie files have each been given well defined file names. Example of which is fiona249-solo-2a then fiona249-solo-2b denoting the 2 videos to make up the complete movie of this Fiona which will be found on movie page 249, and is a solo video, accompanied by a toy or the girls rather capable fingers. So if you are careful there is no excuse at all for downloading the same file twice, that really pisses me off doing that!

 

At the present time there are 259 "albums" of movies. Each album containing 8 different girls with each movie generally split into two halves. Karups tell you the format, type, size and duration of movie and give a reasonable amount of thumbnails, this is very well organised. The thumbnails are excellent quality, so you don`t have to squint to see if "your girl" is ugly or has no tits at all etc. Album 259 is of course the latest album and like all the recent ones, is superb quality. I am a proper fussy so and so when it comes to movie quality, so when I say quality is good, believe me it is. Now when we get to album 221 these are the older type ones, which are set out rather differently, only thumbnails here. Quality is still very good indeed but not quite as good as the previous 38 albums. Now then, we come to album 88 and the quality does dip somewhat. I suppose this is to be expected as these are now the original site offerings from its opening days--do not by-pass these as I have found some unbelievable gorgeous girls in these last 88 albums.

 

I do not have a clue where they find all these young ladies but I can tell you if you have seen even 5% of them elsewhere then I would be VERY surprised. These are all new to me and I have seen some host of adult sites. My theory is, and that's all it is, a theory, is that agents acting on behalf of Karups tour the colleges/universities/students unions of Eastern Europe and offer these girls work. They are all young, legally of course, almost all are slim, fit looking girls, oh how I love them all, they are so darned sexy it should be made illegal on health grounds. One who captured my eye is vicky222, she is very slim, not skinny, with what must be perfect soft D cups and she sure knows how to excite you with them before she delves into her gorgeous, blemish free fairy. There are literally hundreds of these fresh faced young girls doing the sexiest solo acts for you that I have ever seen. They also have lesbian movies for your pleasure. These will be file named; donna-sarah251-gg-1d, for example, the gg denoting it is girl/girl of course and the two girls who are in love with each other. These are very well done lesbian scenes and you get the full impession that they are actually lovers in real life as they seem to know what each other like, I love these secenes. I cannot comment on the small % of hard-core movies they have as I don`t like watching those -- I am sorry but a guy's hairy arse or gonads bouncing about does not do anything for me, hence I refuse to watch those movies. I have no reason to believe they will be anything less than brilliant, as the thought of screwing these girls is rather tempting of course, a case of so many women, so little time.

 

To sum up I would heartily recommend this web-site, unless of course you are an avid hard-core man or woman of course, and if you are a woman who enjoys watching women, you will wear out many a fine dildo on these superb movies. Download times I have found to be very good indeed, I would think from experience you would get faster times from the USA than I do in the UK and I am getting about 260kb/sec combined for two files downloaded. I am well happy with this.

Thanks -- Don UK.

Read the review of Karups PC on Adult Reviews .net here

Take a tour of Karups PC here